Artifact: Change Request
Relationships
Description
Main Description

Change Requests (also known as RFCs) are the means for submitting proposed change and actual change activity in the environment. Change Requests can be triggered for a wide variety of reasons, from a broad spectrum of sources. They can be concerned with any part of the environment or with any service or activity.

Illustrations
Key Considerations

The various states of a Change Request include the following:

  • Conceptualized - A change request that is conceptual in nature, may not have been formally created, and has not yet been submitted.
  • Recorded - The details of a change request, captured in a document or other format defined by the Change Management Framework.
  • Rejected - Any change request which has been rejected, and sent back to the requestor. Reasons for rejection include:
    • Lack of authorization or funding
    • The change requested is beyond the scope of Change Management (for example, it is a new requirement)
    • The change request is incomplete or in error
    • The change request has been assessed as having too high a risk and needs rework

Note: A Change Request, once recorded, is tracked as a Change.  

Simple IMACs may be service requests.  More complex ones are typically change requests because they require approval.

The following items are normally included in both paper and electronic Change Request forms:

  • Change Request number (plus cross reference to Problem report number, where necessary)
  • description and identity of item(s) to be changed (including CI identification(s) if Configuration Management system is in use)
  • reason for Change
  • effect of not implementing the Change
  • version of item to be changed
  • name, location and telephone number of person proposing the Change
  • date that the Change was proposed
  • Change priority
  • impact and resource assessment (which may be on separate forms where convenient)
  • CAB recommendations where appropriate (which may be held separately, with impact and resource assessments, where convenient)
  • authorization signature (could be electronic)
  • authorization date and time
  • scheduled implementation (Release identification and/or date and time)
  • location of Release/implementation plan
  • details of Change builder/implementer
  • back-out plan
  • actual implementation date and time
  • review date
  • review results (including cross-reference to new Change Request where necessary)
  • risk assessment and management
  • impact on business continuity and contingency plans
  • status of Change Request- e.g. 'logged', 'assessed', 'rejected', 'accepted', 'sleeping'.